International human rights and national discretion

The Journal of Ethics 6 (4):373-382 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that the EuropeanCourt of Human Rights couldserve as a model for an international court ofhuman rights to be builtupon the United Nations Committee on HumanRights. It argues that theconcerns states might have over the surrenderof a significant portion oftheir national sovereignity might be lessenedif such an internationalcourt were to incorporate the margin ofappreciation doctrine employed bythe European Court of Human Rights. Thisdoctrine is intended to respectthe customs and traditions of sovereign statesin dealing with humanrights issues, while maintaining that somerights such as the right not tobe tortured will be considered as basic andwill stand independently ofthe customs and traditions of sovereignstates.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#364,497)

6 months
6 (#531,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Resolving interpretive conflicts in international human rights law.Kristen Hessler - 2005 - Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (1):29–52.
An internationalist conception of human rights.David A. Reidy - 2005 - Philosophical Forum 36 (4):367–397.
An Internationalist Conception of Human Rights.David A. Reidy - 2005 - Philosophical Forum 36 (4):367-397.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references