Do the ‘Constants of Nature’ change with Time?

Philosophical Magazine 3 (30):582-585 (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The age of minerals determined by radioactive methods agrees roughly with the age of the galaxy. This suggests that radioactive alpha-decay constants have probably changed by less than a factor of 3 or 4 during the last 3 or 4 × l09 years. It is shown that this implies that many ‘Constants of Nature’, particularly e, h and c probably change more slowly than 10−12 parts per year. The meson coupling constant also appears to change more slowly than this and the beta-coupling constants by less than 10−9 parts per year.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Time, change and time without change.Ken Warmbrod - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):3047-3067.
Could time be change?Denis Corish - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (2):219-232.
Moments of Change.Greg Littmann - 2012 - Acta Analytica 27 (1):29-44.
A probability law for the fundamental constants.B. Roy Frieden - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (9):883-903.
Time for a Change in Public Education, but What Change?Erna Bennett - 2000 - Nature, Society, and Thought 13 (2):181-214.
The Relationist and Substantivalist Theories of Time: Foes or Friends?Jiri Benovsky - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):491-506.
The problem of logical constants.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
13 (#1,043,598)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Cosmology.H. Bondi - 1954 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (16):350-352.

Add more references