A commentary on Dr. Kennedy's perception of the impact of Institutional Review Boards on cancer research

Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):33-40 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Institutional Review Board is a committee of the institution responsible for carrying out the institution's responsibilities for the protection of human research subjects. Since it is a local committee, most of the complaints about the IRB can be resolved locally provided it is borne in mind that the IRB is the champion not only of the human research subject but also of the investigator. National or regional cooperative research protocols present problems that are not insurmountable

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf01103645

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues.Elizabeth A. Buchanan & Charles M. Ess - 2009 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 39 (3):43-49.
5 The Impact of Institutional Review Boards on Research.Bradford Gray & Robert A. Cooke - 1980 - Hastings Center Report 10 (1):36-41.
Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 NCEHR National Conference. [REVIEW]Francis Rolleston, Jack Corman, Serge Gauthier, Paddi O’Hara & Rod Schmaltz - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):69-73.
Cancer causes and cancer research on many levels of complexity.Sunny Y. Auyang - unknown
Ethics issues with private research ethics boards: A breakout session at the 2009 ncehr national conference.Jack Corman Francis Rolleston, Paddi O'Hara Serge Gauthier & Rod Schmaltz - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics.
Institutional Barriers to Research on Sensitive Topics: Case of Sex Communication Research Among University Students.Carey M. Noland - 2012 - Journal of Research Practice 8 (1):Article - M2.
Clinical Study Reflections: Another View: Commentary on: “Raising Suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: Detecting Misconduct”.Patricia Spitzig - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):705-711.
Ethical international research on human subjects research in the absence of local institutional review boards.S. B. Bhat - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):535-536.
Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: Where should we go from here'.Raymond De Vries, Debra A. DeBruin & Andrew Goodgame - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):351 – 368.
Commentary on “six domains of research ethics”.Sheila Slaughter - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):219-222.
Balancing Privacy Protections with Efficient Research: Institutional Review Boards and the Use of Certificates of Confidentiality.Peter M. Currie - 2005 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 27 (5):7.
Institutional review boards and human subjects research.Ccco Occcccocccoc Occccccooccccc Coco Occ Coo - 1984 - Bioethics Reporter 1 (1).
Protecting the human subjects of social science research--the role of institutional review boards.D. Reynolds - 2000 - Bioethics Forum 16 (4):31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
17 (#875,159)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references