Research ethics committee members’ perspectives on paediatric research: a qualitative interview study

Research Ethics 19 (4):494-518 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Research ethics committees (RECs) have a crucial role in protecting children in research. However, studies on REC members’ perspectives on paediatric research are scarce. We conducted a qualitative study to explore Swedish scientific REC members’ perspectives on ethical aspects in applications involving children with severe health conditions. The REC members considered promoting participation, protecting children and regulatory adherence to be central aspects. The results underscored the importance of not neglecting ill children’s rights to adapted information and participation. REC members supported a contextual and holistic approach to vulnerability and risk, which considers the child’s and parents’ psychological wellbeing and the child’s integrity, both short and long term. The ethical complexity of paediatric research requires continuous ethical competence development within RECs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Practicing Ethics and Ethics Praxis.Martin Tolich & Emma Tumilty - 2021 - The Qualitative Report 13 (25):16-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-14

Downloads
7 (#1,392,075)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Null. Null - 2016 - Philosophy Study 6 (9).
Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity, and contextualism.Albert Musschenga - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.
Elucidating the concept of vulnerability: Layers not labels.Florencia Luna - 2009 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):121-139.

View all 28 references / Add more references