Williamson on justification

Philosophical Studies 138 (2):161 - 168 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Timothy Williamson has a marvelously precise account of epistemic justification in terms of knowledge and probability. I argue that the account runs aground on certain cases involving the probability values 0 and 1.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Counterfactuals and Modal Epistemology.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2012 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 86 (1):93–115.
Williamson on inexact knowledge.Anna Mahtani - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (2):171 - 180.
What justification could not be.Mark T. Nelson - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (3):265 – 281.
Williamson on Knowledge and Evidence.Alvin Goldman - 2009 - In Patrick Greenough & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford University Press. pp. 73-91.
Why Williamson should be a sceptic.Dylan Dodd - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):635–649.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
99 (#174,137)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dennis Whitcomb
Western Washington University

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Warrant and proper function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.

View all 19 references / Add more references