Platonic and Fregean Numbers

Philosophia Mathematica 20 (2):224-244 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rather than reading Plato's philosophy of arithmetic ‘charitably’, it is better to try to explain its failure to generate any fruitful ideas. Prominent in the explanation is Plato's focus on predicates assigning cardinalities and on ‘groups’ falling under them. This focus left Plato unable to envisage the possibility, emerging in Dedekind and Frege but which arithmetic in Plato's time would not easily have suggested, of regarding numbers as objects essentially ranged in the structure of a progression

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Platonic number in the parmenides and metaphysics XIII.Dougal Blyth - 2000 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (1):23 – 45.
Frege meets dedekind: A neologicist treatment of real analysis.Stewart Shapiro - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):335--364.
Impure Sets Are Not Located: A Fregean Argument.Roy T. Cook - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):219-229.
Reals by Abstraction.Bob Hale - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):100--123.
A Conversation about Numbers and Knowledge.Charles Sayward - 2002 - American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (3):275-287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-21

Downloads
48 (#332,697)

6 months
6 (#528,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references