Limitations on verbal reports of internal events: A refutation of Nisbett and Wilson and of Bem

Psychological Review 87 (1):105-112 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discusses R. E. Nisbett and T. D. Wilson's work on the limitations to conscious awareness of mental processes. In particular, it is suggested that their theoretical stance is not clearly formulated, that they make unwarranted assumptions about the relationship between conscious awareness and the process and the verbal report, and that their experiments do not provide information on consciousness. Some methodological recommendations are listed, and a brief report is given of some experimental findings that run counter to those of Nisbett and Wilson and also to those of D. Bem in regard to his "self-perception theory."

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Verbal reports on the contents of consciousness: Reconsidering introspectionist methodology.Eddy A. Nahmias - 2002 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 8.
The operational analysis of psychological terms.B. F. Skinner - 1945 - Psychological Review 52 (4):270-78.
Consciousness during dreams.PierCarla Cicogna & Marino Bosinelli - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10 (1):26-41.
Time, action, and consciousness.Axel Cleeremans - 2006 - Human Movement Science.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-26

Downloads
11 (#1,144,917)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Introspection as practice.Pierre Vermersch - 1999 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (2-3):17-42.
Intuitive And Reflective Responses In Philosophy.Nick Byrd - 2014 - Dissertation, University of Colorado

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references