A Note On Horace And Pindar

Classical Quarterly 6 (3-4):221-224 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although not tenable in details, Porphyrion's interpretation seems to me generally preferable to Bentley's, despite the very wide acceptance of the latter. Horace is in all seriousness defending his claim to originality. On the Bentleian interpretation, it is a curious defence that he is made to offer

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Note on Horace and Pindar.C. W. Whitaker - 1956 - Classical Quarterly 6 (3-4):221-.
The 'Theban Eagle'.Richard Stoneman - 1976 - Classical Quarterly 26 (02):188-.
The ‘Theban Eagle’.Richard Stoneman - 1976 - Classical Quarterly 26 (2):188-197.
Horace, Odes_ I. xii. and the _Forum Augustum.D. L. Drew - 1925 - Classical Quarterly 19 (3-4):159-.
Horace, Odes_ I. xii. and the _Forum Augustum.D. L. Drew - 1925 - Classical Quarterly 19 (3-4):159-164.
Some 'Central' Thoughts on Horace's Odes.L. A. Moritz - 1968 - Classical Quarterly 18 (01):116-.
Some ‘Central’ Thoughts on Horace's Odes.L. A. Moritz - 1968 - Classical Quarterly 18 (1):116-131.
Catvllvs and Horace on Svffenvs and Alfenvs.Tenny Frank - 1920 - Classical Quarterly 14 (3-4):160-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
11 (#1,162,085)

6 months
2 (#1,250,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references