An Investigation of the Interrelationship Between the Doctrines of Divine Action, Sovereignty, Omniscience, and Scripture and its Significance for Contemporary Debates on Biblical Authority

Dissertation, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study suggests that a neglected area of research in our contemporary bibliology polemics is the logical relationship between one's view of God and one's view of Scripture. In fact, it is argued that one of the reasons for the diversity of opinion in theologians' views of Scripture is linked to differing conceptions of God and his relationship to the world. ;Chapter one outlines recent discussions regarding the God-Scripture relationship by showing their strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, it delimits the scope of this work by focusing on three areas of one's theology proper which is crucial for one's bibliology: divine action, divine sovereignty, and divine omniscience. ;Chapters two and three discuss the relationship between divine action and Scripture. In chapter two an interventionist model of divine action is investigated by examining the views of evangelical theism and Karl Barth. Chapter three investigates a non-interventionist model of divine action by examining the views of process theology and Maurice Wiles. It is concluded that the interventionist model of evangelical theism best substantiates the traditional view of Scripture--the Received View. ;Chapter four broaches the relationship between divine sovereignty and human freedom and Scripture, especially in regards to inspiration. Two main construals of divine sovereignty are explored depending upon whether one adopts a compatibilistic or incompatibilistic view of human freedom. It is concluded that there is a logical relationship between divine sovereignty-freedom and Scripture and that the construal of divine sovereignty which incorporates a compatibilistic view of human freedom best grounds the Received View. ;Chapter five discusses the relationship between divine omniscience and Scripture by investigating various responses to the foreknowledge-freedom problem. By examining various deterministic and indeterministic responses to the problem, it is argued that if one adopts an indeterministic solution to the problem, one cannot guarantee that the prophecies of Scripture are true. However if one adopts a deterministic solution, one is able to make such a claim. ;Chapter six concludes the study by summarizing the findings of the work. It concludes that there is a God-Scripture link which must not be neglected

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Divine Command/Divine Law: A Biblical Perspective.Patrick D. Miller - 2010 - Studies in Christian Ethics 23 (1):21-34.
Divine Nature and Divine Will.Hugh J. McCann - 2013 - Sophia 52 (1):77-94.
Science and Divine Action.Nancey Murphy - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 732--739.
Jihad Revisited.Paul L. Heck - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (1):95-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references