Stimulus control during the summation of conditioned suppression

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (2):204 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0029562

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Attentional processes along a composite stimulus continuum during free-operant summation.Stanley J. Weiss - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (1p1):22.
Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: I. The conditioned eyelid response to light.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (6):690.
The magnitude of binocular summation as a function of the method of stimulus presentation.George Collier & Philip Kubzansky - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (4):355.
Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: II. The conditioned galvanic skin response to an auditory stimulus.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (1):35.
A further application of composite-stimulus control in additive summation.Shih-Yuan Tsai & Stanley J. Weiss - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9 (3):169-172.
Does conditioned suppression measure the resistance to change of operant behaviour?Julian C. Leslie - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):103-104.
The acquisition of a trace conditioned response as a function of the magnitude of the stimulus trace.B. Reynolds - 1945 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 35 (1):15.
A study of patterning in the conditioned eyelid response.D. A. Grant - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 25 (5):445.
Intensity of conditioned stimulus and rate of conditioning.L. F. Carter - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (6):481.
Single-alternation patterning in a conditioned suppression procedure with and without trace stimulus support.John J. B. Ayres & Charles N. Uhl - 1983 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (2):157-160.
Stimulus generalization after training on three stimuli: A test of the summation hypothesis.Harry I. Kalish & Norman Guttman - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (4):268.
Effects of CS-onset UCS-termination delay, UCS duration, CS-onset UCS-onset interval, and number of CS-UCS pairings on conditioned fear response.Andrew Strouthes - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (3):287.
The effects of nonreinforced and randomly reinforced stimulus preexposure on conditioned suppression in rats.Mary Shore Logan & Paul Schnur - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (4):336-338.
Amount of conditioning and intensity of conditioned stimulus.Herbert D. Kimmel - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (4):283.
Binocular summation in scotopic vision.D. Shaad - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (4):391.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
19 (#803,294)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references