Brentano's Criticism of the Correspondence Theory of Truth and the Principle "Ens et verum convertuntur"

Grazer Philosophische Studien 5 (1):183-195 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper investigates Brentano's criticism of the correspondence theory of truth within the context of a discussion of his ontological assumptions. Brentano's interpretation of the formula Veritas est adaequatio rei et intellectus and of the principle ens et verum convertuntur is shown to fit into the history of these principles and into modern interpretations like that of Tarski.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

01659227

DOI

10.5840/gps1978529

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Brentano’s Criticism of the Correspondence Theory of Truth and the Principle “Ens et verum convertuntur”.Paul Weingartner - 1978 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 5 (1):183-195.
Brentano's Revision of the Correspondence Theory.Susan Krantz - 1990 - Brentano Studien 3:79-88.
„Ens et verum convertuntur–Factum et verum convertuntur. Zur Problematik mittelalterlicher und neuzeitlicher Ontologie “.Vinzenz Rüfner - 1950 - Philosophisches Jahrbuch 60:406-437.
For keeping truth in truthmaking.Fraser MacBride - 2013 - Analysis 73 (4):686-695.
The True and the Evident.Franz Brentano - 1930/1966 - New York,: Routledge. Edited by Oskar Kraus & Roderick M. Chisholm.
Brentano's criticism of the correspondence conception of truth and Tarski's semantic theory.Jan Woleński - 1989 - Topoi 8 (2):105-110.
Forget about the ‘correspondence theory of truth’.David Lewis - 2001 - Analysis 61 (4):275–280.
Brentano's Theory of Categories: A Critical Reappraisal.Peter M. Simons - 1988 - Brentano Studien 1:47-61.
Brentano on Truth.Johannes Brandl - 2017 - In Uriah Kriegel (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Franz Brentano and the Brentano School. London and New York: Routledge.
Brentano's Late Ontology.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski - 2002 - Brentano Studien 10:221-236.
Realism and correspondence: reply to Arno Aurélio Viero.O. Chateaubriand - 2004 - Manuscrito 27 (1):47-53.
Ens et verum convertuntur?Paul Weingartner - 1979 - Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 26:145-162.
Tarskian truth and the correspondence theory.Luis Fern & Ndez Moreno - 2001 - Synthese 126 (1-2):123-147.
Ens et verum convertuntur?P. Weingartner - 1987 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 35 (1):109-123.
Franz Brentano and the Principle of Individuation.Wojciech Zelaniec - 1995 - Brentano Studien 6:145-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
21 (#758,365)

6 months
2 (#1,250,447)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Weingartner
University of Salzburg

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references