How you talk is how you think; how you think is how you understand

In Jan Visser & Muriel Visser (eds.), Seeking Understanding: The Lifelong Pursuit to Build the Scientific Mind. Boston: Brill | Sense (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

As one is: to free the mind from all conditioning.J. Krishnamurti - 2007 - Prescott, Ariz.: Hohm Press.
Trash talk and Kantian values.Ornaith O’Dowd - 2022 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 49 (3):383-397.
Ian Ramsey on Talk about God (Continued).Donald Evans - 1971 - Religious Studies 7 (3):213 - 226.
100 F. Merrell knowing full well that talk, well, it's just talk. In the United States, talk is more often than in Brazil meant to be taken quite seriously, and customary naivete waxes indignantly outraged when it is paid little heed; yet talk invariably becomes cloudy, for, after all, if it were perfectly.A. Assinatura das Coisas - 1996 - Semiotica 108 (1/2):99-127.
Why Do We Talk To Ourselves?Felicity Deamer - 2020 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (2):425-433.
Intuition-Talk: Virus or Virtue?James Andow - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (2):523-531.
Self-talk and Self-awareness: On the Nature of the Relation.Alain Morin - 1993 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 14 (3):223-234.
Talk about talk about talk about art.Allan Shields - 1967 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (2):187-192.
‘What it is Like’ Talk is not Technical Talk.Jonathan Farrell - 2016 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (9-10):50-65.
Represented speech: private lives in public talk.Zane Goebel - 2016 - Pragmatics 26 (1):51-67.
Theory-Talk, Meta-Theory- Talk and Metaphysical-Talk: Intricacies and Pertinence of three Levels of Discourse in the Scientific Realism-Debate.Sreekumar Jayadevan - manuscript
Wittgenstein, Schopenhauer, and Ethics.A. Phillips Griffiths - 1973 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 7:96-116.
Wittgenstein, Schopenhauer, and Ethics.A. Phillips Griffiths - 1973 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 7:96-116.
Irrealism about Grounding.Naomi Thompson - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:23-44.
Accounting for achievement in parent-teacher interviews.Carolyn Baker & Jayne Keogh - 1995 - Human Studies 18 (2-3):263 - 300.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-03

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references