A review of T Dare, The Counsel of Rogues? A Defence of the Standard Conception of the Lawyer's Role [Book Review]

Legal Ethics 12 (2):249-257 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Lawyer's Reading of Chesterton.John R. Cartwright - 1975 - The Chesterton Review 2 (1):22-38.
A Lawyer's Reading of Chesterton.John R. Cartwright - 1975 - The Chesterton Review 2 (1):22-38.
Is it Morally Wrong to Defend Unjust Causes as a Lawyer?Eduardo Rivera-López - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (2):177-189.
L'avarice, Étude De Psychologie Morbide.Rogues de Fursac Rogues de Fursac - 1906 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 61:164.
Les conversions religieuses.Rogues de Fursac Rogues de Fursac - 1907 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 63:518.
Why the traditional conception of toleration still matters.John Horton - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (3):289-305.
Counsel, Command and Crisis.Joanne Paul - 2015 - Hobbes Studies 28 (2):103-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
37 (#442,878)

6 months
1 (#1,508,411)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Lawyers and Justice.David Luban - 1990 - Law and Philosophy 9 (3):311-317.

Add more references