Should philosophy replace religious education? Reflections following brendan larvor's article ‘Tu Quoque, archbishop’: Watson Philosophy and religious education

Think 3 (9):7-12 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Think, Issue 7, Brendan Larvor took the Archbishop of Canterbury to task for suggesting that atheism and humanism should not be taught in schools alongside the major faiths. Here, Brenda Watson defends the Archbishop's position.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tu quoque, Archbishop.Brendan Larvor - 2004 - Think 3 (7):101-108.
The Philosophy of Christian Religious Education.Brenda Watson & Jeff Astley - 1995 - British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (2):242.
Pedagogy for Inter‐Religious Education.Brendan Carmody - 2013 - Heythrop Journal 54 (5):813-824.
Priorities in Religious Education.Brenda Watson - 1993 - British Journal of Educational Studies 41 (3):303-303.
In Favour of Ethics Education, Against Religious Education.John Tillson - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (4):675-688.
Justice in education and religious freedom.Jon Mahoney - 2014 - Social Philosophy and Policy 31 (1):276-294.
The Right to Religious Education in Lithuania.Birutė Pranevičienė & Agnė Margevičiūtė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (2):443-458.
Feeling the force of argument.Brendan Larvor - 2009 - In Andrea Kenkmann (ed.), Teaching Philosophy. Continuum. pp. 134-152.
Brendan Larvor, Lakatos: An Introduction. [REVIEW]Mary Leng - 1999 - Philosophy in Review 19:198-200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
62 (#262,361)

6 months
13 (#204,126)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references