The Judicial Decision

Ethics 75 (1):47-56 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/phib.1962.3.issue-1

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Wasserstrom: The Judicial DecisionThe Judicial Decision. Richard A. Wasserstrom.Ronald Dworkin - 1964 - Ethics 75 (1):47-.
The Judicial Decision: Toward a Theory of Legal Justification. [REVIEW]Richard A. Wasserstrom - 1963 - Philosophical Review 72 (2):253-255.
The Unchangeable Judicial Formats.Paul van den Hoven - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):499-511.
The Unchangeable Judicial Formats.Paul Hoven - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):499-511.
Review: Wasserstrom: The Judicial Decision. [REVIEW]Ronald Dworkin - 1964 - Ethics 75 (1):47 - 56.
Meaning and truth in judicial decision.Jerzy Wróblewski - 1979 - Helśinki: Juridica. Edited by Aulis Aarnio.
Judicial review: a practising judge's perspective.S. Breyer - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (2):153-166.
Straddling the Fence Between Truth and Pretense: The Role of Law and Preference in Judicial Decision Making and the Future of Judicial Independence.Charles Geyh - 2008 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 22 (2):435-450.
The Responsible judge: readings in judicial ethics.John Thomas Noonan & Kenneth I. Winston (eds.) - 1993 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
'Streamlining' the rule of law: How the department of justice is undermining judicial review of agency action.Shruti Rana - manuscript
Science of Legal Method.Ernest Bruncken & Layton B. Register (eds.) - 1917 - New York: A. M. Kelley.
Formal aspects of Legal reasoning.A. Soeteman - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):731-746.
Questioning Judicial Deliberations.Jan Komárek - 2009 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (4):805-826.
Ethical Principles for Judges.Canadian Judicial Council - 1998
“¿Importa el derecho?”. Política judicial, realismo jurídico y el problema de la indeterminación del derecho en tanto que problema metodológico.Pablo José Castillo Ortiz - 2014 - Isegoría 51:575-596.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
52 (#307,868)

6 months
6 (#529,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Disarming nuclear apologists.Robert E. Goodin - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):153 – 176.
Argumentation Theory and the conception of epistemic justification.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2009 - In Marcin Koszowy (ed.), Informal logic and argumentation theory. Białystok: University of Białystok. pp. 285--303.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references