Scribes, Electronic Health Records, and the Expectation of Confidentiality

Journal of Clinical Ethics 29 (3):240-243 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHRs) have largely replaced obsolete paper medical charts. This replacement has produced an increased demand on physicians’ time and has compromised efficiency. In an attempt to overcome this perceived obstacle to productivity, physicians turned to medical scribes to perform the work required by EHRs. In doing so, they have introduced an uninvited participant in the physician-patient relationship and compromised patients’ confidentiality. Scribes may be a successful work around for physicians frustrated by EHRs, but patients’ confidentiality should not be sacrificed in the process.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Confidentiality, Electronic Health Records, and the Clinician.Stuart Graves - 2013 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 56 (1):105-125.
An Ethical Case for Medical Scribes.David Schwan - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (1):95-104.
Tracking Referents in Electronic Health Records.Werner Ceusters & Barry Smith - 2005 - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 116:71–76.
Privacy and Health Information Technology.Deven McGraw - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (s2):121-149.
Safeguarding Confidentiality in Electronic Health Records.Akhil Shenoy & Jacob M. Appel - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (2):337-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-14

Downloads
2 (#1,809,250)

6 months
2 (#1,206,727)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?