Proportionate reason and its three levels of inquiry: Structuring the ongoing debate

In Christopher Robert Kaczor (ed.), Proportionalism: For and Against. Marquette University Press (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reason and desire.Michael Smith - 1988 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 88:243-58.
Richard McCormick and Proportionate Reason.Sanford S. Levy - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):258 - 278.
When is enough enough? The integration of competing scientific agendas.Jozsef A. Toth - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):212-213.
Organizing ethics: A stakeholder debate. [REVIEW]Harry Hummels - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1403-1419.
Proportionate taxation as a fair division of the social surplus: The strange career of an idea.Barbara H. Fried - 2003 - Economics and Philosophy 19 (2):211-239.
The MacKay-Skinner debate: A case for “nothing buttery”.David A. Washburn - 1997 - Philosophical Psychology 10 (4):473 – 479.
The ethics of memory blunting and the narcissism of small differences.Erik Parens - 2010 - Neuroethics 3 (2):99-107.
Afterword: Proportionality and the difference death makes.William A. Edmundson - 2002 - Criminal Justice Ethics 21 (2):40-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Richard McCormick, SJ, and Dual Epistemology.P. A. Clark - 2008 - Christian Bioethics 14 (3):236-271.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references