- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Under stochastic dominance Choquet-expected utility and anticipated utility are identical
Theory and Decision 29 (2):119-132 (1990)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Convex stochastic dominance with finite consequence sets.Peter C. Fishburn - 1974 - Theory and Decision 5 (2):119-137.
Revealed Preference and Expected Utility.Stephen A. Clark - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):159-174.
Expected utility and constrained maximization: Problems of compatibility. [REVIEW]Hans Lottenbach - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (1):37 - 48.
A Process Approach to the Utility for Gambling.Marc Le Menestrel - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (3):249-262.
Lottery-Dependent Utility via Stochastic Benchmarking.Paola Modesti - 2003 - Theory and Decision 55 (1):45-57.
Nondegenerate Intervals of No-Trade Prices for Risk Averse Traders.Gerd Weinrich - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (1):79-99.
Cost-Benefit versus Expected Utility Acceptance Rules.Alex C. Michalos - 1970 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970 (1):375-402.
Evaluating the pasadena, altadena, and st petersburg gambles.Terrence L. Fine - 2008 - Mind 117 (467):613-632.
Reconciliation with the Utility of Chance by Elaborated Outcomes Destroys the Axiomatic Basis of Expected Utility Theory.Robin Pope - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (3):223-234.
Lottery Dependent Utility: a Reexamination.Ulrich Schmidt - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (1):35-58.
Paradox Lost, but in which Envelope?Olav Gjelsvik - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):353-362.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-01-04
Downloads
84 (#201,255)
6 months
9 (#313,570)
2013-01-04
Downloads
84 (#201,255)
6 months
9 (#313,570)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion.Peter Wakker - 1994 - Theory and Decision 36 (1):1-44.
Uncertainty aversion and aversion to increasing uncertainty.Aldo Montesano & Francesco Giovannoni - 1996 - Theory and Decision 41 (2):133-148.
The Likelihood Method for Decision under Uncertainty.Mohammed Abdellaoui & Peter P. Wakker - 2005 - Theory and Decision 58 (1):3-76.
Production under uncertainty and choice under uncertainty in the emergence of generalized expected utility theory.John Quiggin - 2022 - Theory and Decision 92 (3-4):717-729.
Positivity of bid-ask spreads and symmetrical monotone risk aversion.Moez Abouda & Alain Chateauneuf - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (2):149-170.
References found in this work
Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity.David Schmeidler - 1989 - Econometrica 57:571-589.
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.D. Kahneman & A. Tversky - 1979 - Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:263--291.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-cc9fg uwo