In defence of ordinary objects and a naturalistic answer to the special composition question

In Javier Cumpa & Bill Brewer (eds.), The Nature of Ordinary Objects. New York: Cambridge University Press (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward a Commonsense Answer to the Special Composition Question.Chad Carmichael - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):475-490.
Conceptual Conservatism and Contingent Composition.Josh Parsons - 2013 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (4):327-339.
The special composition question in action.Sara Rachel Chant - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):422-441.
A Relevance Constraint on Composition.David Vander Laan - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):135-145.
Composition as a secondary quality.Uriah Kriegel - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):359-383.
Brutal Composition.Ned Markosian - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 92 (3):211 - 249.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-12

Downloads
98 (#176,584)

6 months
26 (#112,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Ladyman
University of Bristol

Citations of this work

Object.Bradley Rettler & Andrew M. Bailey - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1.
The Metaphysics of Mass Expressions.Mark Steen - 2012 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Object.Henry Laycock - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references