Ethical Problems of Digitization and Robotization in Medicine

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 63 (2):104-122 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article discusses the ethical problems that arise when implementing the processes of digitization and robotization in medicine, and focuses on the relationship between the doctor and the patient. The purpose of this article is to identify the limits of the transformative impact of these processes on the medical profession. The possibilities and disadvantages of telemedicine are considered, and the role of artificial intelligence in modern medical practice is analyzed. A comparative characteristic of the traditional paternalistic model of the doctor’s attitude to the patient and the modern engineering model replacing it is given. The study identified risks of computerization for doctors and patients, which may include the lack of direct contact between the doctor and the patient, the inability to “physical examination,” the uncertainty of liability for medical errors, as well as problems of maintaining the confidentiality of personal data of patients. The dominance of a technical-type model can lead to depersonalization of the patient and replacement of most doctors with artificial intelligence systems and robots. Since modern medicine belongs to two categories – “human territory,” which implies taking care of a person as the main task, and “machine territory,” which is associated with the automation of many processes, the article raises a natural question about the place of a doctor in the modern world. The analysis made it possible to draw some conclusions. With the widespread introduction of artificial intelligence and robotic systems into medicine, the relationship between doctor and patient is being transformed. Diagnostics, treatment and medical manipulations will increasingly be assigned to machines, which will free doctors from the impossible task of collecting a huge array of medical data and free up time to communicate with patients. Intelligent machines and robotic systems will outperform doctors in diagnosing diseases and performing precise surgeries, but they will never replace doctors in caring for patients. An important task of modern medicine is to maintain “live contact” between the doctor and the patient.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Too much medicine and the poor climate of trust.Zoe Fritz & Richard J. Holton - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (11):748-749.
Are doctors altruistic?W. Glannon - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):68-69.
Doctor–patient-interaction is non-holistic.Halvor Nordby - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (2):145-152.
The Duty of the Patient to Cooperate.Jörg Löschke - 2017 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 21 (1):7-26.
Medical Explanations and Lay Conceptions of Disease and Illness in Doctor-Patient Interaction.Halvor Nordby - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics: Philosophy of Medical Research and Practice 29 (6):357-370.
Three stages of medical dialogue.Henry Abramovitch & Eliezer Schwartz - 1996 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (2).
The Doctor by Luke Fildes: An Icon in Context. [REVIEW]Y. Michael Barilan - 2007 - Journal of Medical Humanities 28 (2):59-80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-01

Downloads
54 (#296,637)

6 months
13 (#197,903)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations