- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Western monopoly of climate science is creating an eco-deficit culture
Land and Climate Review (2021)
Abstract
Western monopoly of climate science is creating an eco-deficit culture: A recent study showed that 78% of global climate science funding flows to European and North American institutions. Dr. Quan-Hoang Vuong gives his perspective on why this is a problem for the planet. (Land & Climate Review; November 11, 2021)My notes
Similar books and articles
Western monopoly of climate science is creating an eco-deficit culture.Quan-Hoang Vuong - 2021 - The Land and Climate Review.
Uncertainty in Climate Science and Climate Policy.Jonathan Rougier & Michel Crucifix - 2018 - In Elisabeth A. Lloyd & Eric Winsberg (eds.), Climate Modelling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues. Springer Verlag. pp. 361-380.
The Nature of Climate Science: Challenges for the Development of Climate Change Science Literacy in Education.Raymond Ndubisi Anyanwu - 2019 - Africa International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 2 (5).
Climate Science, The Philosophy of.Richard Bradley, Roman Frigg, Katie Steele, Erica Thompson & Charlotte Werndl - 2020 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Klimaresiliens.Theresa Scavenius & Malene Rudolf Lindberg - 2016 - Slagmark - Tidsskrift for Idéhistorie 73:141-155.
Therapeutic Professions and the Diffusion of Deficit.Kenneth Gergen - 1990 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 11 (3-4):353-368.
Philosophy of climate science part I: observing climate change.Roman Frigg, Erica Thompson & Charlotte Werndl - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (12):953-964.
Philosophy of climate science part II: modelling climate change.Roman Frigg, Erica Thompson & Charlotte Werndl - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (12):965-977.
A Sociotechnical Framework for Governing Climate Engineering.Rob Bellamy - 2016 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 41 (2):135-162.
Seepage, objectivity, and climate science.Ryan O'Loughlin - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 81:74-81.
'Climategate': Paradoxical Metaphors and Political Paralysis.Brigitte Nerlich - 2010 - Environmental Values 19 (4):419-442.
Can science and religion respond to climate change?Mary Evelyn Tucker - 2015 - Zygon 50 (4):949-961.
What does robustness teach us in climate science: a re-appraisal.Eric Winsberg - 2021 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 21):5099-5122.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-09-21
Downloads
163 (#120,654)
6 months
94 (#51,730)
2023-09-21
Downloads
163 (#120,654)
6 months
94 (#51,730)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Our commentary on forest protection and carbon credits trade.A. I. S. D. L. Team - 2024 - Sm3D Portal.
References found in this work
Analysis: The lack of diversity in climate-science research.Ayesha Tandon - 2021 - Carbon Brief 2021 (10):1-25.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8fb5884b9-f9vjj uwo