The Kantian Capacity for Moral Self-Control: Abstraction at Two Levels

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 102 (1):102-130 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As a rule, the Kantian capacity for self-control is interpreted as a kind of tool for compelling ourselves to act on the basis of the maxims we have adopted. To the extent that we merely acknowledge its role in following already-adopted maxims, however, we fail to capture the distinctive aspect of moral self-control identified by Kant. In this paper, I propose a fuller account of the Kantian capacity for moral self-control; I do so mainly by analyzing this capacity as our ability to “abstract from” various sensible impressions. This analysis shows that Kant’s conception of moral self-control involves two intimately related levels, which are subject to different criteria. Whereas the first level is connected to our ability to adopt moral maxims and requires that we abstract from all sensible impressions, the second is associated with our ability to follow these maxims and does not necessarily require this radical abstraction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kantian Reasons for Reasons.Noell Birondo - 2007 - Ratio 20 (3):264-277.
Crafting Maxims.Tobey Scharding - 2016 - Teaching Ethics 16 (1):37-53.
The Role of Moral Feeling in Kantian Ethics.Margaret Dell Jewett - 1986 - Dissertation, University of Southern California
Kant on woman and morality: Série 2.Maria Borges - 2010 - Kant E-Prints 5:162-168.
Moral Responsibility and Motivational Mechanisms.James D. Steadman - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):473 - 492.
Kant on Women and Emotion.Maria Borges - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 25:13-19.
Impermissibility and Kantian Moral Worth.Jill Graper Hernandez - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):403-419.
Two Dogmas of Kantian Ethics.Scott Forschler - 2013 - Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (3):255-269.
Responsibility, control, and omissions.John Martin Fischer - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (1):45-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-26

Downloads
15 (#951,094)

6 months
10 (#275,239)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marijana Vujosevic
Leiden University

Citations of this work

Kant's account of moral weakness.Marijana Vujošević - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy (1):40-54.
Kant-Bibliographie 2020.Margit Ruffing - 2022 - Kant Studien 113 (4):725-760.
Kant’s Conception of Moral Strength.Marijana Vujošević - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):539-553.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant's Theory of Freedom.Henry E. Allison - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant's Empirical Psychology.Patrick R. Frierson - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant.Henry E. Allison - 1995 - In Ted Honderich (ed.), The philosophers: introducing great western thinkers. New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references