Once More about the Concept of Civil Society: A Philosophical Approach

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 10:114-129 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a huge number of publications devoted to civil society. Nevertheless this theme is inexhaustible, because the very subject of it is multidimensional and changing along with the evolution of society. Alongside this, one of the key problems of the civil society theory is a problem of its perception in our mind. Answering these questions, the author, at first, stresses the necessity to differ three historical types of civil society: ancient classical polis, civil communities of the Modern History and contemporary civil society. They all are substantially different inter se from the axiological point of view. That is a reason not to use the ideological and methodological curves developed for historically previous types of civil society for the analysis of contemporary one. Secondly, the author focuses attention upon epistemological aspect of the civil society theory, in particular he proposes to rethink the concept of “totality” not in a formal logic way but in the “logic” of living systems in order to be able by means of this concept to express the unity of the diversity of social system. Thirdly, the author treats the concept of “citizen” in informal sense, stresses its existential, personal content and contemplates it through the dialectical relation of “totality-peculiarity-individuality.” Fourthly, the author researches the phenomenon of contemporary civil society as a counterpart of a state in the complex society the main features of which are the diversity and individuality. He comes to the conclusion that the civil society is not a society in common sense, but rather is some kind of “soil structure,” so called “social mycelium” that fertilizes social system with new opportunities. In the final part of the article author gives the example of one of the approaches to estimate the degree of maturation of civil society, proposed by the world-wide international organization “Civicus.” He stresses that the logic of power distribution in contemporary society presupposes cooperation of different actors, and one of the most influential of them is the civil society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Concept and Feature of the Civil Society.Jian Hu & Chun-shi Dong - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):113-116.
China’s State in the Trenches.Scott Wilson - 2012 - ProtoSociology 29:57-75.
The Role of Advocacy in Civil Society.J. P. Zompetti - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (2):167-183.
Adam Smith on civility and civil society.Richard Boyd - 2013 - In Christopher J. Berry, Maria Pia Paganelli & Craig Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford University Press. pp. 443.
Poverty and class structure in Hegel's theory of civil society.Homas E. Vartenberg - 1981 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 8 (2):169-182.
Da função da sociedade civil em Hegel y Habermas.Delamar José Volpato Dutra - 2006 - Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 11 (35):55-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-04

Downloads
9 (#1,258,077)

6 months
6 (#529,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Lectures on ethics.Immanuel Kant - 1930 - London,: Methuen & co.. Edited by Louis Infield.
The German Ideology.Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels - 1939 - Science and Society 3 (4):563-568.
Lectures on ethics.Immanuel Kant - 1980 - International Journal of Ethics (1):104-106.
Lectures on Ethics.Immanuel Kant - 1932 - International Journal of Ethics 43 (1):104-106.
Democracy and Complexity: A Realistic Approach.Danilo Zolo - 1992 - Pennsylvania State University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references