The basic assumptions of e-z reader are not well-founded

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):506-507 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary focuses on the two basic assumptions of the E-Z Reader model, discussing the possibility that adjacent words in reading may be processed in parallel rather than serially, and presenting evidence against a cognitive control of eye guidance in reading.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x0351010x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The e-z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models.Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner & Alexander Pollatsek - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):445-476.
Basic assumptions concerning eye-movement control during reading.George W. McConkie & Shun-Nan Yang - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):493-494.
Reading the scene: Application of e-z reader to object and scene perception.Peter De Graef & Filip Germeys - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):479-480.
On keeping word order straight.Alan Kennedy - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):490-491.
How can selection-for-perception be decoupled from selection-for-action?Cécile Beauvillain & Pierre Pouget - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):478-479.
E-z reader 7 provides a platform for explaining how low- and high-level linguistic processes influence eye movements.Gary E. Raney - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):498-499.
The game of word skipping: Who are the competitors?Ralf Engbert & Reinhold Kliegl - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):481-482.
Are there two populations of refixations in the reading of long words?Karine Doré-Mazars, Dorine Vergilino-Perez & Thérèse Collins - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):480-481.
Future challenges to e-z reader: Effects of OVP and morphology on processing long and short compounds.Jukka Hyönä & Raymond Bertram - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):488-489.
Psycholinguistic processes affect fixation durations and orthographic information affects fixation locations: Can e-z reader cope?Simon P. Liversedge & Sarah J. White - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):492-493.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#630,488)

6 months
4 (#863,447)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references