- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Revisiting the constraint attunement hypothesis: Reply to Ericsson, Patel, and Kintsch (2000) and Simon and Gobet (2000) [Book Review]
Psychological Review 107 (3):601-608 (2000)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
How experts' adaptations to representative task demands account for the expertise effect in memory recall: Comment on Vicente and Wang (1998).K. Anders Ericsson, Vimla Patel & Walter Kintsch - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (3):578-592.
Long-term working memory.K. Anders Ericsson & Walter Kintsch - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (2):211-245.
Expertise effects in memory recall: Comment on Vicente and Wang (1998).Herbert A. Simon & Fernand Gobet - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (3):593-600.
Why the dynamical hypothesis cannot qualify as a law of qualitative structure.Nick Braisby, Richard Cooper & Bradley Franks - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):630-631.
Verbal reports as data.K. Anders Ericsson & Herbert A. Simon - 1980 - Psychological Review 87 (3):215-251.
Five Seconds or Sixty? Presentation Time in Expert Memory.Fernand Gobet & Herbert A. Simon - 2000 - Cognitive Science 24 (4):651-682.
Phenomenological reports as data.K. Anders Ericsson, William G. Chase & Herbert A. Simon - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (4):601-602.
Functional cerebral reorganization: a signature of expertise? Reexamining Guida, Gobet, Tardieu, and Nicolas' (2012) two-stage framework.Alessandro Guida, Fernand Gobet & Serge Nicolas - 2013 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.
Schemas, not syntax: a reply to Patel.Justin London - 2011 - In Patrick Rebuschat, Martin Rohrmeier, John A. Hawkins & Ian Cross (eds.), Language and Music as Cognitive Systems. Oxford University Press. pp. 242.
Does Blackburn’s Expressivism Have a Problem with Respect to Supervenience? A Reply to Wright and Zangwill.Jorn Sonderholm - 2009 - Metaphysica 10 (1):89-95.
How Can Experts See the Invisible? Reply to Bilalić and Gobet.Alexandre Linhares & Paulo Brum - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (5):748-751.
Ii. mathematical modelling of election predictions: Comments to Simon 's reply.Karl Egil Aubert - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):132 – 134.
Analogue Magnitudes, the Generality Constraint, and Nonconceptual Thought.Jacob Beck - 2014 - Mind 123 (492):1155-1165.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
12 (#1,091,732)
6 months
1 (#1,478,518)
2016-06-30
Downloads
12 (#1,091,732)
6 months
1 (#1,478,518)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rv6xt uwo