Identifying future-proof science

Oxford: Oxford University Press (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Explores how to identify future-proof science. Peter Vickers takes a transdisciplinary approach in his analysis of 'scientific fact' in order to defend science against potentially dangerous scepticism.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Call number

Q175.V52 2023

ISBN(s)

9780192862730   0192862731
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What is future-proof science?Peter Vickers - 2022 - In Identifying Future-Proof Science.
Proof of Concept Research.Steve Elliott - 2021 - Philosophy of Science 88 (2):258-280.
Positive evidence in science and technology.Joseph Agassi - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (2):261-270.
Skepticism and the future.Frederick L. Will - 1950 - Philosophy of Science 17 (4):336-346.
Evidence, proof, and facts: a book of sources.Peter Murphy (ed.) - 2003 - New York ;: Oxford University Press.
Evidence Matters: Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law.Susan Haack - 2014 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Exuberant skepticism.Paul Kurtz - 2010 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by John R. Shook.
Concepts of Proof in Mathematics, Philosophy, and Computer Science.Peter Schuster & Dieter Probst (eds.) - 2016 - Boston: De Gruyter.
Does Proof of Concept Trump All? RRI Dilemmas in Research Practices.Anita Borch & Harald Throne-Holst - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (1):1-21.
Philosophy of sustainability experimentation _ experimental legacy, normativity and transfer of evidence.Stojanovic Milutin - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-22.
Moore’s Proof of an External World and the Problem of Skepticism.Charles Landesman - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:21-36.
The Tenets of Cognitive Existentialism.Dimitri Ginev - 2011 - Ohio University Press.
Understanding Inconsistent Science.Peter Vickers - 2013 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Are there logical limits for science?E. M. Zemach - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):527-532.
On Evidence, Medical and Legal.Donald W. Miller & Clifford Miller - 2005 - Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 10 (3):70-75.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-13

Downloads
14 (#983,512)

6 months
8 (#351,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Vickers
Durham University

Citations of this work

How can we assess whether to trust collectives of scientists?Elinor Clark - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references