Nancy Levene, Powers of Distinction: On Religion and ModernityPowers of Distinction: On Religion and Modernity [Book Review]

Journal for the History of Modern Theology/Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte 26 (2):147-151 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/znth-2019-0024

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Powers of Distinction: On Religion and ModernityPowers of Distinction: On Religion and Modernity. [REVIEW]Theodore M. Vial - 2019 - Journal for the History of Modern Theology/Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte 26 (2):147-151.
Modernity and the Study of Religion.Mahmūd Khātemi - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 7 (25):4-16.
Spinoza’s Revelation: Religion, Democracy, and Reason.Nancy Levene - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Autonomer Geltungssinn und religioser Begrundungszusammenhang. Papst Gelasius I. ( 496) als Fallstudie zur religionspolitischen Differenzsemantik.Georg Essen - 2013 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 99 (1):1-10.
Autonomer Geltungssinn und religiöser Begründungszusammenhang. Papst Gelasius I. († 496) als Fallstudie zur religionspolitischen Differenzsemantik.Georg Essen - 2013 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 99 (1):1-10.
Reading the Silences,Questioning the Terms: A Response to the Focus on Eighteenth‐Century Ethics.Robert Merrihew Adams - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2):281-284.
Spinoza's Revolution: Religion, Democracy, and Reason. By Nancy K. Levene.G. Havers - 2005 - The European Legacy 10 (7):757.
Omnipotence and Promise: The Legacy of the Scholastic Distinction of Powers.Francis Oakley - 2002 - Pontificial Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
An absolute distinction between faith and science: Contrast without compartmentalization.Hermen Kroesbergen - 2018 - Zygon 53 (1):9-28.
Scotus’s Interpretation of Metaphysics 9.2.Cruz González-Ayesta - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:217-230.
Assurance and confidence in the two sources of morality and religion: a sociological interpretation of the distinction between static religion and dynamic religion.Frédéric Keck - 2012 - In Alexandre Lefebvre & Melanie Allison White (eds.), Bergson, Politics, and Religion. Durham: Duke University Press.
Rorty, religion and the public–private distinction.Lauren Swayne Barthold - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (8):861-878.
Die Unterscheidung von öffentlicher und privater Religion bei Johann Salomo Semler. Zur neuzeittheoretischen Relevanz einer christentumstheoretischen Reflexionsfigur.Martin Laube - 2004 - Journal for the History of Modern Theology/Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte 11 (1):1-23.
Scotus’s Interpretation of Metaphysics 9.2.Cruz González-Ayesta - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:217-230.
The Why of Science and the How of Religion.Edward B. St Clair - 1993 - Tradition and Discovery 20 (3):5-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-14

Downloads
1 (#1,907,951)

6 months
1 (#1,498,899)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ted Vial
Iliff School of Theology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references