Euthanasia and the Moral Meaning of Suffering

Dissertation, Fordham University (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation explores the relationship between euthanasia and the meaning of suffering. It argues that the question of euthanasia is most centrally a question about the meaning and significance of suffering and suggests that an adequate perspective on euthanasia in Catholic theology must be drawn from a theological understanding of suffering and human freedom. It further suggests that a freedom-centered approach to suffering and euthanasia can be an instructive and valuable point of dialogue between theology and secular bioethics. Theological resources for the dissertation include Bernard Haring's approach to medical ethics and freedom, and the deeper appreciation of suffering and freedom found in Karl Rahner's theological anthropology and christology. ;Chapter 1 presents an analysis of various arguments for and against euthanasia, showing how each argument embodies a particular anthropology. The chapter concludes that many arguments lack a much needed sense of the meaning of suffering in human life. ;Chapter 2 turns to Bernard Haring's argument that a convincing argument against euthanasia can only be made in the "perspective of freedom." This insight, a critical point of departure, establishes freedom as a essential point of reference for medical ethics. ;Chapters 3 shows how a theology of freedom, drawn from the theological anthropology of Karl Rahner, enables the construction of an adequate theological perspective on the meaning of suffering. Rahner's theological understanding of freedom is examined in three movements: the relationship between suffering, finitude, and freedom; the moral challenge of illness for freedom; freedom and the incomprehensibility of suffering understood as part of God's own incomprehensibility. ;Chapter 4 draws a connection between freedom in Rahner's theological anthropology, his christological understanding of the cross, and the christological interpretation of suffering and death in Catholic theology. The chapter employs the three movements developed in chapter 3 to establish the suffering and death of Jesus as a paradigmatic example of human freedom engaging suffering. ;Chapter 5 applies the above theological insights to the arguments examined in chapter 1, demonstrating how opposition to euthanasia in Catholic theology is strengthened by an articulate approach to suffering and freedom. The chapter also comments on how a freedom centered approach to euthanasia can be of assistance to the wider bioethical community

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Suffering in the Clinical Setting.Danny Lee Franke - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
Euthanasia: Some Critical Remarks.Adejumobi Ayodele - 2009 - Etica E Politica 11 (1):441-454.
Assisted suicide, suffering and the meaning of a life.Miles Little - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (3):287-298.
Revisiting Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: The Issue of Suffering.Benoit Morin - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
The medicalization of dying.Michael M. Burgess - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (3):269-279.
Voluntariness, suffering and euthanasia.Martin Van Hees - 2003 - Philosophical Explorations 6 (1):50 – 64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references