Indifference of subjects: An alternative to equipoise in randomized clinical trials

Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):295-323 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The physician who upholds the Hippocratic oath is supposed to be loyal to his or her patients. This requires choosing only the therapy that the physician believes is best for the patient. However, knowing what is best requires randomized clinical trials. Thus, clinicians must be willing to recruit their patients to be assigned at random to one of two therapies in order to determine which is best based on the highest standards of pharmacological science

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Will the real Charles Fried please stand up?Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):353-357.
Clinical equipoise and the incoherence of research ethics.Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):151 – 165.
The irrelevance of equipoise.Robert M. Veatch - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):167 – 183.
Pulling the plug on clinical equipoise: A critique of Miller and Weijer.Fred Gifford - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):203-226.
Uncertainty and the ethics of clinical trials.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):149-167.
So-called "clinical equipoise" and the argument from design.Fred Gifford - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):135 – 150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#388,637)

6 months
11 (#238,317)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?