`World' is not a count noun

Noûs 29 (2):139-157 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The word "world" has in fact many ordinary uses as a count noun; I shall discuss some of them below.(2) There is however also a distinctive philosophical use found in recent ontology (in the sense in which Quine reintroduced this term in analytic philosophy, for theories about what there is). As to this philosophical use, I shall argue that there is no reason to think that it refers to anything, if indeed it is intelligible at all

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
516 (#36,786)

6 months
112 (#38,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bas C. Van Fraassen
San Francisco State University

Citations of this work

Must there be a top level?Einar Duenger Bohn - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):193-201.
Monism, Emergence, and Plural Logic.Einar Duenger Bohn - 2012 - Erkenntnis 76 (2):211-223.
The Universe among Other Things.Achille C. Varzi - 2006 - Ratio 19 (1):107–120.
How negative truths are made true.Aaron M. Griffith - 2015 - Synthese 192 (1):317-335.
Composition as Identity: A Study in Ontology and Philosophical Logic.Einar Bohn - 2009 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references