- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review of Neuroscience and critique: Exploring the limits of the neurological turn [Book Review]
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 36 (4):250-255 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Death and the Resurrection of (Psy)critique: The Case of Neuroeducation.J. De Vos - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):129-145.
Exploring the Limits of Analytic Philosophy: A Critique of Nozick's Philosophical Explanations.Nicholas Capaldi - 1984 - Interpretation 12 (1):107-125.
Limits of thought and Husserl's phenomenology.Brian Redekopp - 2011 - Dissertation, Mcgill University
Review of Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience. [REVIEW]Clifford van Ommen - 2013 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 33 (3):199-202.
Psychodynamic and neurological perspectives on ADHD: Exploring strategies for defining a phenomenon.Adam Rafalovich - 2001 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 31 (4):397–418.
What is Wrong with Addiction.Jesse S. Summers - 2015 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 22 (1):25-40.
Remarks on the concept of critique in Habermasian thought.Simon Susen - 2010 - Journal of Global Ethics 6 (2):103-126.
The philosophy of neuroscience.John Bickle, Pete Mandik & Anthony Landreth - 2006 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Should Repugnance Give Us Pause? On the Neuroscience of Daily Moral Reasoning.Aaron Cardon & J. S. Blumenthal-Barby - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics- Neuroscience 2 (2):47-48.
Editorial on psychoanalytical neuroscience: exploring psychoanalytic concepts with neuroscientific methods.Nikolai Axmacher, Henrik Kessler & Gerd T. Waldhauser - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
Emotional experience: A neurological model.K. M. Heilman - 2000 - In Richard D. R. Lane, L. Nadel, G. L. Ahern, J. Allen & Alfred W. Kaszniak (eds.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion. Oxford University Press. pp. 328--344.
Against Speculation, or, a Critique of the Critique of Critique: A Remark on Quentin Meillassoux's After Finitude (After Colletti).Alberto Toscano - 2011 - In Levi R. Bryant, Nick Srnicek & Graham Harman (eds.), The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. re.press.
Responsibility and the brain sciences.Felipe De Brigard, Eric Mandelbaum & David Ripley - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):511-524.
What Setting Limits May Mean: A Feminist Critique of Daniel Callahan's "Setting Limits". [REVIEW]Nora K. Bell - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (2):169 - 178.
Neglect: A Disorder of Spatial Attention.Anjan Chatterjee - 2002 - In Mark D'Esposito (ed.), Neurological Foundations of Cognitive Neuroscience. The MIT Press. pp. 1-26.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-10-26
Downloads
10 (#1,219,902)
6 months
1 (#1,512,999)
2016-10-26
Downloads
10 (#1,219,902)
6 months
1 (#1,512,999)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8fb5884b9-k4bxp uwo