Making Biomedical Sciences publications more accessible for machines

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 25 (2):179-190 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

With the rapidly expanding catalogue of scientific publications, especially within the Biomedical Sciences field, it is becoming increasingly difficult for researchers to search for, read or even interpret emerging scientific findings. PubMed, just one of the current biomedical data repositories, comprises over 33 million citations for biomedical research, and over 2500 publications are added each day. To further strengthen the impact biomedical research, we suggest that there should be more synergy between publications and machines. By bringing machines into the realm of research and publication, we can greatly augment the assessment, investigation and cataloging of the biomedical literary corpus. The effective application of machine-based manuscript assessment and interpretation is now crucial, and potentially stands as the most effective way for researchers to comprehend and process the tsunami of biomedical data and literature. Many biomedical manuscripts are currently published online in poorly searchable document types, with figures and data presented in formats that are partially inaccessible to machine-based approaches. The structure and format of biomedical manuscripts should be adapted to facilitate machine-assisted interrogation of this important literary corpus. In this context, it is important to embrace the concept that biomedical scientists should also write manuscripts that can be read by machines. It is likely that an enhanced human–machine synergy in reading biomedical publications will greatly enhance biomedical data retrieval and reveal novel insights into complex datasets.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Causality, mosaics, and the health sciences.Olaf Dammann - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (2):161-168.
Introduction: Ludwik Fleck’s epistemology of medicine and biomedical sciences.Ilana Löwy - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (3):437-445.
Philosophies of the Sciences: A Guide.Fritz Allhoff (ed.) - 2009 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rockefeller strategies for scientific medicine: molecular machines, viruses and vaccines.Jean-Paul Gaudillière - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (3):491-509.
Introduction: Making sense of data-driven research in the biological and biomedical sciences.S. Leonelli - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):1-3.
The farm and the clinic: an inquiry into the making of our biotechnological modernity.Jean-Paul Gaudillière - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):521-529.
Kind-Making, objectivity, and political neutrality; the case of Solastalgia.Shane Nicholas Glackin - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):209-218.
Managing differences in biomedical research: The case of standardizing interferons.Toine Pieters - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 29 (1):31-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-19

Downloads
11 (#1,144,917)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?