Direct perception in mathematics: A case for episemological priority

Logique Et Analyse 45 (179-180):357-72 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Was Reid a Direct Realist?Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):302 - 323.
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception.Michael Huemer (ed.) - 2001 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Perceiving empirical objects directly.Robert G. Hudson - 2000 - Erkenntnis 52 (3):357-371.
Thomas Reid on acquired perception.Rebecca Copenhaver - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):285-312.
Can non-pure perception be direct?Aaron Ben-Zeev - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (July):315-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bart Van Kerkhove
Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Citations of this work

How to think about informal proofs.Brendan Larvor - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):715-730.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references