Anselm's Ontological

Abstract

Therefore, Lord, you who give knowledge of the faith, give me as much knowledge as you know to be fitting for me, because you are as we believe and that which we believe. Indeed, we believe you are something greater than which cannot be thought. Or is there no such kind of thing, for "the fool said in his heart, 'there is no God'" (Ps. 14:1, 53:1)? Certainly, however, that same fool, having heard what I just said, "something greater than which cannot be thought," understands what he heard, and what he understands is in his thought, even if he does not think it exists. For it is one thing for something to exist in a person's thought and quite another for the person to think that thing exists. For when a painter thinks ahead to what he will paint, he has that picture in his thought, but he does not yet think it exists, because he has not done it yet. Once he has painted it, he has it in his thought and thinks it exists because he has done it. Thus, even the fool is compelled to grant that something greater than which cannot be thought exists in thought, because he understands what he hears, and whatever is understood exists in thought. And certainly that greater than which cannot be understood cannot exist only in thought, for if it exists only in thought it could also be thought of as existing in reality as well, which is greater. If, therefore, that than which greater cannot be thought exists in thought alone, then that than which greater cannot be thought turns out to be that than which something greater actually can be thought, but that is obviously impossible. Therefore, something than which greater cannot be thought undoubtedly exists both in thought and in reality

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Ratio, Intelligere, and Cogitare in Anselm’s Ontological Argument.Catherine Nolan - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:199-208.
On the logic of the ontological argument.Paul E. Oppenheimer & Edward N. Zalta - 1991 - Philosophical Perspectives 5:509-529.
Become what you are.Alan Watts - 1995 - Boston: Shambhala. Edited by Mark Watts.
How Can Theology Be Moral?Oliver O'Donovan - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):81 - 94.
Harman on self referential thoughts.Christopher S. Hill - 2006 - Philosophical Issues 16 (1):346-357.
Conceptual Closure in Anselm's Proof.Tony Roark - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (1):1-14.
Ow! The Paradox of Pain.Christopher S. Hill - 2005 - In Murat Aydede (ed.), Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. Cambridge Ma: Bradford Book/Mit Press.
Anselmian Theism and Indefinitely Extensible Perfection.Einar Duenger Bohn - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):671-683.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-16

Downloads
10 (#1,214,260)

6 months
1 (#1,503,385)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references