The approach towards equilibrium in Lanford’s theorem

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (3):309-335 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper develops a philosophical investigation of the merits and faults of a theorem by Lanford , Lanford , Lanford for the problem of the approach towards equilibrium in statistical mechanics. Lanford’s result shows that, under precise initial conditions, the Boltzmann equation can be rigorously derived from the Hamiltonian equations of motion for a hard spheres gas in the Boltzmann-Grad limit, thereby proving the existence of a unique solution of the Boltzmann equation, at least for a very short amount of time. We argue that, by establishing a statistical H-theorem, it offers a prospect to complete Boltzmann’s combinatorial argument, without running against the objections which plug other typicality-based approaches. However, we submit that, while recovering the irreversible approach towards equilibrium for positive times, it fails to predict a monotonic increase of entropy for negative times, and hence it yields the wrong retrodictions about the past evolution of a gas

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Boltzmann, Gibbs, and the concept of equilibrium.David A. Lavis - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):682-696.
The coarse-graining approach to statistical mechanics: How blissful is our ignorance?Katinka Ridderbos - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):65-77.
Thermal Equilibrium Between Radiation and Matter.G. Lanyi - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (3):511-528.
Foundations of statistical mechanics—two approaches.Stephen Leeds - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):126-144.
A probabilistic foundation of elementary particle statistics. Part I.Domenico Costantini & Ubaldo Garibaldi - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (4):483-506.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-05

Downloads
29 (#552,493)

6 months
5 (#644,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Laws of Nature as Constraints.Emily Adlam - 2022 - Foundations of Physics 52 (1):1-41.
On How to Approach the Approach to Equilibrium.Joshua Luczak - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (3):393-411.
Philosophy of statistical mechanics.Lawrence Sklar - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Time’s arrow and Archimedes’ point.Huw Price - 1996 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1093-1096.
Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time.Huw Price - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):135-159.
The “Past Hypothesis”: Not even false.John Earman - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (3):399-430.

View all 13 references / Add more references