The shortest possible length of the longest implicational axiom

Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (1):101 - 108 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A four-valued matrix is presented which validates all theorems of the implicational fragment, IF, of the classical sentential calculus in which at most two distinct sentence letters occur. The Wajsberg/Diamond-McKinsley Theorem for IF follows as a corollary: every complete set of axioms (with substitution and detachment as rules) must include at least one containing occurrences of three or more distinct sentence letters. Additionally, the matrix validates all IF theses built from nine or fewer occurrences of connectives and letters. So the classic result of Jagkovski for the full sentential calculus -that every complete axiom set must contain either two axioms of length at least nine or else one of length at least eleven-can be improved in the implicational case: every complete axiom set for IF must contain at least one axiom eleven or more characters long. Both results are "best possible", and both apply as well to most subsystems of IF, e.g., the implicational fragments of the standard relevance logics, modal logics, the relatives of implicational intutionism, and logics in the Lukasiewicz family

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#389,886)

6 months
2 (#1,204,205)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Formal Logic.Arthur N. Prior & Norman Prior - 1955 - Oxford,: Oxford University Press.
Note on truth-tables.Jan Kalicki - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (3):174-181.
On the number of variables in the axioms.M. D. Gladstone - 1970 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 11 (1):1-15.
A five-valued model of the $E$-$p$-$q$-theses.Dolph Ulrich - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1):137-138.
On the Number of Variables in the Axioms.M. D. Gladstone - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (4):755-756.

Add more references