The Philosophy of the Sciences that Received Philosophy of Science Neglected. Historical Perspectives

(ed.)
Springer (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Topology as an Issue for History of Philosophy of Science.Thomas Mormann - 2013 - In Hanne Andersen, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Thomas Uebel & Gregory Wheeler (eds.), New Challenges to Philosophy of Science. Springer. pp. 423--434.
Testing Times: Confirmation in the Historical Sciences.Ben Jeffares - 2008 - Dissertation, Australian National University
Laws of nature, natural history, and the description of the world.James W. McAllister - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (3):245 – 258.
To Dismiss "The Received View".Joseph Agassi - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):449-456.
A Plea for a Historical Epistemology of Research.Hans-Jörg Rheinberger - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):105-111.
Implications of the Cognitive Sciences for the Philosophy of Science.Ronald N. Giere - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:419 - 430.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-22

Downloads
17 (#869,916)

6 months
9 (#309,818)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Uebel
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references