Mathematical Skepticism: Are We Brains in a Countable Vat?

Philosophica 43 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.21825/philosophica.82452

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Neither mentioning 'brains in a vat' nor mentioning brains in a vat will prove that we are not brains in a vat.Marian David - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):891-896.
Brains in a vat.Anthony L. Brueckner - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):148-167.
Magic, semantics, and Putnam’s vat brains.Mark Sprevak & Christina Mcleish - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (2):227-236.
If I am a brain in a vat, then I am not a brain in a vat.Anthony Brueckner - 1992 - Mind 101 (401):123-128.
Direct realism and the brain-in-a-vat argument.Michael Huemer - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):397-413.
External world skepticism.John Greco - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (4):625–649.
Brains in a Vat, Subjectivity, and the Causal Theory of Reference.Kirk Ludwig - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17:313-345.
Does Putnam's argument Beg the question against the skeptic? Bad news for radical skepticism.Olaf Müller - 2001 - Erkenntnis 54 (3):299-320.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
33 (#483,942)

6 months
8 (#359,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references