Pictorial depth: Intensity and aesthetic surface [Book Review]

Axiomathes 15 (1):1-28 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers seldom ask questions regarding how certain phenomena occur, because such questions tend to be the province of the sciences or of technology. However, the question how pictures have depth requires philosophical reflection because it takes place on the surface of pictorial objects and involves both physical and phenomenal, i.e. aesthetic, features of those surfaces. This essay examines how pictures have depth by first separating the aesthetic question from interpretive considerations, and thereby refining the question how pictures have depth. Next it explicates two sorts of conceptual tools required to understand the question: several complex concepts needed to understand surfaces, and the concept of intensity. These are then used to understand how pictures can have depth by showing how intensities produce both an aesthetic surface and depth within it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Merleau-ponty's concept of depth.Anthony J. Steinbock - 1987 - Philosophy Today 31 (4):336-351.
Is twofoldness necessary for representational seeing?Bence Nanay - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):248-257.
Why the pictorial relation is not reference.Alon Chasid - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (3):226-247.
Touching pictures.Robert Hopkins - 2000 - British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (1):149-167.
Matisse’s La Danse: On the Semantics of the Surface in Modern Painting.Holger Otten - 2008 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):173-183.
Flat surfaces and pictorial depth.Paul Richter - 1969 - British Journal of Aesthetics 9 (3):231-245.
The conflicted character of picture perception.Boyd Millar - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):471–477.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#250,430)

6 months
9 (#347,496)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Difference and repetition.Gilles Deleuze - 1994 - London: Athlone Press.
The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Cambridge, England: Allen & Unwin.
Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late modern philosophy: essential readings with commentary. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1937 - New York,: Routledge.

View all 10 references / Add more references