Realization of analysis into explicit mathematics

Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1848-1864 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We define a novel interpretation R of second order arithmetic into Explicit Mathematics. As a difference from standard D-interpretation, which was used before and was shown to interpret only subsystems proof-theoretically weaker than T 0 , our interpretation can reach the full strength of T 0 . The R-interpretation is an adaptation of Kleene's recursive realizability, and is applicable only to intuitionistic theories

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explicit mathematics with the monotone fixed point principle.Michael Rathjen - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):509-542.
Power types in explicit mathematics?Gerhard Jäger - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1142-1146.
On power set in explicit mathematics.Thomas Glass - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (2):468-489.
Platonism and aristotelianism in mathematics.Richard Pettigrew - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (3):310-332.
A Realizability Interpretation for Classical Arithmetic.Jeremy Avigad - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):439-440.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
245 (#83,069)

6 months
8 (#365,731)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?