Abstract

In Confucius, Rawls and the Sense of Justice, in addition to making an interesting comparison between Rawls’ and Confucius’ sense of justice, Erin M. Cline also tried to seek elements of distributive justice, or at least concern for distributive matters, in the Analects. I shall, in this essay, try to pursue the subject even further, by examining Confucianism’s attitude towards the contemporary distributive ideals in the analytical philosophy literature—egalitarianism, prioritarianism and sufficientarianism. This will be done by first closely examining Cline’s interpretation of certain passages of the Analects, showing that there might be other possible interpretations of these passages. From these parts of the Analects, I will attempt to demonstrate that Confucius has not given us sufficient normative discussion of the economic matters of society for our purpose. I will therefore turn to Mencius and Xunzi for better understanding of distributive justice in Confucianism, and then argue against Joseph Chan’s thesis that Confucian distributive justice can be characterized as simply sufficientarianism, providing evidence that Confucianism may also care about equality and priority in general.