Decision-making process regarding passive euthanasia: Theory of planned behavior framework

Nursing Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Background Nurses have an essential role in caring for end-of-life patients. Nevertheless, the nurse’s involvement in the passive euthanasia decision-making process is insufficient and lower than expected. Objectives To explore factors associated with nurses’ intention to be involved in non-treatment decisions (NTD) regarding passive euthanasia decision-making versus their involvement in the palliative care of patients requesting euthanasia, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) framework. Design A cross-sectional study utilizing a random sample. Participants and research context The study was conducted in one of the largest hospitals in Israel among 125 nurses employed in internal and surgical care wards. Data was collected through face-to-face interviews between March and April 2019. Method A closed structured questionnaire was developed according to TPB instructions. A paired sample t test and two multiple hierarchical regressions were conducted. Variance explained (R2) and the significance of F change were calculated for each regression. The study used the STROBE statement guideline. Ethical considerations The study was approved by the hospital’s Helsinki Committee (#20.11.2017). Findings A paired sample t test revealed that nurses’ involvement in the palliative care of patients requesting passive euthanasia was significantly higher than in NTD regarding euthanasia. Regression analyses revealed that nurses’ position and attitudes explain their intention to be involved in decision-making; attitudes and perceived behavioral control explain nurses’ intention to be involved in the care of patients requesting euthanasia. Conclusions According to the TPB, nurses’ attitudes explained their intention to participate in decision-making regarding passive euthanasia. It is recommended to enhance open discussion of this complex issue to encourage nurses’ willingness to participate in NTD decision-making regarding euthanasia.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Passive and active euthanasia: What is the difference? [REVIEW]Bernward Gesang - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):175-180.
Passive euthanasia.E. Garrard - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):65-68.
What passive euthanasia is.Iain Brassington - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-13.
Japanese Attitudes Toward Euthanasia In Hypothetical Clinical Situations.Noritoshi Tanida - 1998 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 8 (5):138-141.
Euthanasia is never “Passive”.Lars Johan Materstvedt - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 20:15-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-08

Downloads
12 (#1,079,938)

6 months
12 (#208,861)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?