A meaning explanation for HoTT

Synthese 197 (2):651-680 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the Univalent Foundations of mathematics spatial notions like “point” and “path” are primitive, rather than derived, and all of mathematics is encoded in terms of them. A Homotopy Type Theory is any formal system which realizes this idea. In this paper I will focus on the question of whether a Homotopy Type Theory can be justified intuitively as a theory of shapes in the same way that ZFC can be justified intuitively as a theory of collections. I first clarify what such an “intuitive justification” should be by distinguishing between formal and pre-formal “meaning explanations” in the vein of Martin-Löf. I then go on to develop a pre-formal meaning explanation for HoTT in terms of primitive spatial notions like “shape”, “path” etc.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Identity in HoTT, Part I.James Ladyman & Stuart Presnell - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica 23 (3):386-406.
Does Homotopy Type Theory Provide a Foundation for Mathematics?James Ladyman & Stuart Presnell - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw006.
Models of HoTT and the Constructive View of Theories.Andrei Rodin - 2019 - In Deniz Sarikaya, Deborah Kant & Stefania Centrone (eds.), Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics. Springer Verlag.
Metaphor and Meaning.Alec Hyslop - 2001 - Sorites 13:23-32.
Speaker's meaning.Frank Vlach - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (3):359 - 391.
Towards an explanation of copula effects.Gerhard Jäger - 2003 - Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (5):557-593.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
116 (#154,461)

6 months
9 (#312,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What Types Should Not Be.Bruno Bentzen - 2020 - Philosophia Mathematica 28 (1):60-76.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The iterative conception of set.George Boolos - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (8):215-231.
Rigor and Structure.John P. Burgess - 2015 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
Category theory as an autonomous foundation.Øystein Linnebo & Richard Pettigrew - 2011 - Philosophia Mathematica 19 (3):227-254.
Structuralism, Invariance, and Univalence.Steve Awodey - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (1):1-11.

View all 21 references / Add more references