The Confucian View of the Relationship between Knowledge and Action and Its Relevance to Action Research

Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 (13):1474-1486 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are marked similarities between Confucian ideas about the relationship between action, knowledge and learning, and contemporary educational thinking about action research. Examples can be seen in the relationship between action and research. First, Confucius emphasized the importance of ‘action’ which was different from ‘research’. The Confucian view of action implies that one should engage in a research process of deliberation in advance and then decide whether to take action or not. This kind of researched action is refined by the process of deliberation which could be called ‘research pre action’—the first stage of action research. Second, Confucius emphasized the importance of knowledge, and this reveals that Confucius emphasized the importance of knowledgeable action. This view of the relationship between knowledge and action inspires an insight into the relationship between knowledge, action, and action research. This competence to research and acquire new understanding in action could be called ‘research in action’—the second stage of action research. Third, Confucius emphasized the importance of learning to connect the relationship between knowledge and action. According to Confucius, learning is an important medium to accumulate knowledge, enable action, and improve the relationship between knowledge and action. And it might enable the possibility of a set of relations in which ‘action’ and ‘research’ might no longer be segregated in their traditional dichotomy. This relationship could be called ‘research on action’ in the third stage of action research. These observations of the Confucian view show a new direction in action research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy, methodology and action research.Wilfred Carr - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (4):421–435.
Intentional action first.Yair Levy - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):705-718.
Pragmatic Failure and the Attribution of Belief.Richard W. Field - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:133-143.
Action research and policy.Lorraine Foreman-Peck & Jane Murray - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (s1):145-163.
Knowledge in action.John Gibbons - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):579-600.
Knowledge in Action.Jonathan Weisberg - 2013 - Philosophers' Imprint 13.
Identity dynamics, action and context.Anne Marie Costalat-Founeau - 1999 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 (3):289–300.
Intentional action and the unintentional fallacy.Ryan Wasserman - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):524-534.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
21 (#743,384)

6 months
7 (#441,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking through Confucius.David L. Hall & Roger T. Ames - 1987 - Philosophy East and West 41 (2):241-254.
You and your action research project.J. McNiff, P. Lomax & J. Whitehead - 1997 - British Journal of Educational Studies 45 (3):329-330.
The Curriculum Experiment: Meeting the Challenge of Social Change.John Elliott - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2):196-198.

View all 8 references / Add more references