>What can Austrian economists learn from the post Keynesians? Reply to Davidson

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):399-406 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Paul Davidson has argued that there is little common ground between Post Keynesian analysis and the Austrian approach to economics. He claims that Post Keynesians (unlike Austrian economists) place great importance on the role of expectations and do not present a deterministic view of the economic system. In this essay the validity of such claims is examined.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/08913819308443307

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

After Davidson, who needs the Austrians? Reply to Davidson.David L. Prychitko - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):371-380.
The economics of ignorance or ignorance of economics?Paul Davidson - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):467-487.
Why the acrimony? Reply to Davidson.Stephan Boehm & Karl Farmer - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):407-421.
On the Austrianness of Austrian economics.Barry Smith - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (1-2):212-238.
Complex Dynamics and Post Keynesian Economics.J. Barkley Rosser - unknown
Varieties of Austrian Price Theory: Rothbard Reviews Kirzner.Joseph Salerno - 2011 - Libertarian Papers 3.
Between Cambridge and Vienna: The Risky Business of New Austrian Business Cycle Theory.J. Barkley Rosser - unknown
Is socialism really “impossible”?Bryan Caplan - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (1):33-52.
Boettke's Austrian critique of mainstream economics: An empiricist's response.Thomas Mayer - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (1-2):151-171.
The faults of formalism and the magic of markets.Daniel M. Hausman - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (1-2):127-138.
Between Vienna and Cambridge: The risky business of new Austrian business‐cycle theory. [REVIEW]J. Barkley Rosser - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (3-4):373-389.
Brentano and His Place in Austrian Philosophy.Edgar Morscher - 1978 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 5 (1):1-10.
Reappraising austrian economics' basic tenets in the light of aristotelian ideas.Ricardo F. Crespo - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
18 (#855,749)

6 months
7 (#486,539)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines.G. L. S. Shackle - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (2):151-163.
The economics of ignorance or ignorance of economics?Paul Davidson - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):467-487.

Add more references