Critical Notice: The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All False, by Patrick Todd [Book Review]

Philosophical Quarterly (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Patrick Todd's The Open Future defends the view that all future contingent statements, like ‘It will rain tomorrow’, are false.1 Not only is ‘It will rain tomor.

Similar books and articles

Patrick Todd, The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False[REVIEW]Elijah Hess - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (4):294-297.
Some Problems with the Russellian Open Future.Jacek Wawer - 2018 - Acta Analytica 33 (4):413-425.
The open future, bivalence and assertion.Corine Besson & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):251-271.
Review of: Todd, Patrick. The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False. [REVIEW]Elijah Hess - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (4):298-301.
Knowing Future Contingents.Ezio Di Nucci - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (1):43-50.
Assertion and the Future.Corine Besson & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2018 - In Sanford C. Goldberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-504.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-18

Downloads
189 (#106,122)

6 months
98 (#47,799)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephan Torre
University of Aberdeen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Past, Present and Future.Arthur N. Prior - 1967 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Counterfactuals and comparative possibility.David Lewis - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (4):418-446.
The open future, bivalence and assertion.Corine Besson & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):251-271.

Add more references