Medical ethics: a brief response to Seedhouse

Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1):47-48 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Medical ethics is that branch of applied philosophy which considers issues of values raised by medical practice, and should not be equated with 'principlism'. Clarification of facts/values distinctions is an important part of this work. The notion that medical philosophy can flourish in the hands of medical 'generalists' without specialist philosophers, is misguided. Both must work together to promote right reason and right action in medical education and practice

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Seedhouse.R. S. Downie - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):116-117.
Camouflage is no defence--a response to Kottow.D. Seedhouse - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):344-350.
Against medical ethics: a response to Cassell.D. Seedhouse - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (1):13-17.
Definitions.D. Seedhouse - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):116-117.
Undignifying institutions.D. Seedhouse - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6):368-372.
A reply to Professor Seedhouse.M. H. Kottow - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):349-350.
Health Promotion: Models and Values.David Seedhouse - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (2):106-106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
63 (#258,700)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.

Add more references