Response to Special Section: Cloning: Technology, Policy, and Ethics

&
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (2):241-245 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A recent issue of CambridgeQuarterlyofHealthcareEthics provides a fascinating look into the uncertainties surrounding the subject of human cloning. As Nelkin and Lindee point out, for example, the popular assumption is that this technology will lead to individual immortality. life everlasting for the deserving.considers the use of cloning for the replication of human individuals to be ethically unacceptable.”

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0963180199002145

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to Special Section: “Cloning: Technology, Policy, and Ethics” (CQ Vol 7, No 2) But What If We Feel That Cloning Is Wrong? [REVIEW]Matti Häyry - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (2):205-208.
Response to “Entitlement to Cloning” by Timothy Murphy (CQ Vol 8, No 3) and “Cloning and Infertility” by Carson Strong (CQ Vol 7, No 3) May a Woman Clone Herself? [REVIEW]Jean E. Chambers - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (2):194-204.
Response to “Difference and the Delivery of Healthcare”.Tom Koch, Kathryn Braun & James H. Pietsch - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (1):123-127.
Response to “Special Section on Children as Organ Donors” : A Critique.David Steinberg - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (3):301-305.
Response to ???May a Woman Clone Herself???? by Jean E. Chambers (CQ Vol 10, No 2) and ???Entitlement to Cloning??? by Timothy F. Murphy (CQ Vol 8, No 3). [REVIEW]Carson Strong - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (1):76-82.
Cloning humans from the perspective of the Christian churches.R. Cole-Turner - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):33-46.
A special section on research in engineering ethics towards a research programme for ethics and technology.Michiel Brumsen & Ibo van de Poel - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):365-378.
Response to “Cloning and Infertility” by Carson Strong.Timothy F. Murphy - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):364-368.
Human cloning: Three mistakes and an alternative.Françoise Baylis - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (3):319 – 337.
What pluralism, why pluralism, and how? A response to Charles Ess.Kei Hiruta - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):227-236.
Response to “Clone Alone” by Carson Strong and “Are There Limits to the Use of Reproductive Cloning” by Timothy Murphy. [REVIEW]Jean E. Chambers - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (2):169-179.
Introduction to the Special Section, 'The Ethics of Geoengineering: Investigating the Moral Challenges of Solar Radiation Management'.Dane Scott - 2012 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (2):133 - 135.
Response to "May a Woman Clone Herself" by Jean Chambers.Timothy F. Murphy - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (1):83-86.
What's So Bad About Human Cloning?Yitzchok Breitowitz - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (4):325-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
39 (#408,230)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references