Who are the beneficiaries?

Bioethics 6 (4):288–296 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2007

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-8519.1992.tb00207.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Defining the Limits of Emergency Humanitarian Action: Where, and How, to Draw the Line?N. Ford, R. Zachariah, E. Mills & R. Upshur - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (1):68-71.
Harmful Beneficence.Lisa Rivera - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):197-222.
Sovereigns and third party beneficiaries.Douglas N. Husak - 1979 - Journal of Value Inquiry 13 (2):149-153.
Was I Entitled or Should I Apologize? Affirmative Action Going Forward.Anita L. Allen - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (3):253-263.
Rights, Claimants, and Beneficiaries.David Lyons - 1969 - American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (3):173 - 185.
Genetic engineering in agriculture: Who stands to benefit? [REVIEW]Christian J. Peters - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):313-327.
The Reluctant Beneficiaries: The Teacher and the Public Examination System.B. A. Gillham - 1977 - British Journal of Educational Studies 25 (1):50 - 62.
International NGO Health Programs in a Non-Ideal World: Imperialism, Respect & Procedural Justice.Lisa Fuller - 2012 - In E. Emanuel J. Millum (ed.), Global Justice and Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 213-240.
On the Repugnance of the Repugnant Conclusion.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2006 - Theoria 72 (2):126-137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#254,649)

6 months
18 (#153,210)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Torbjörn Tännsjö
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

Is the repugnant conclusion repugnant?Jesper Ryberg - 1996 - Philosophical Papers 25 (3):161-177.
Our right to in vitro fertilisation--its scope and limits.T. Tannsjo - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):802-806.
Epistemic repugnance four ways.Brian Talbot - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):3001-3022.
Group epistemic value.Jeffrey Dunn - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (1):65-92.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references