When questioners count on recipients’ lack of knowledge

Pragmatics and Society 7 (4):618-637 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper studies a type of question-answer sequences which accomplish what can be considered as a delicate activity due to its projected sequential development. In contrast with other formats of question-answer sequences with different functions, here the studied format seems to count on the questionee’s lack of knowledge, consequently projecting the questioner’s own answer. This hypothesis is examined through a detailed analysis of video-recorded guided tours in French and Italian. The paper describes the different sequence trajectories occurring after the guide’s question, and the difficulties both participants may find in dealing with the procedure.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Count(ifq) does not imply Count.Søren Riis - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 90 (1-3):1-56.
Lack of retardation with convulsed recipients in the kindling paradigm.John Gaito - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (2):183-184.
What does it take to "have" a reason?Mark Schroeder - 2011 - In Andrew Evan Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press. pp. 201--22.
Privacy and lack of knowledge.Don Fallis - 2013 - Episteme 10 (2):153-166.
Count(q) versus the pigeon-hole principle.Søren Riis - 1997 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 36 (3):157-188.
Knowledge of Knowledge and of Lack of Knowledge in the Charmides.T. F. Morris - 1989 - International Studies in Philosophy 21 (1):49-61.
Welfare, Work Requirements, and Dependant-Care.Elizabeth Anderson - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3):243-256.
Against Credibility.Joseph Shieber - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):1 - 18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-07

Downloads
32 (#495,901)

6 months
5 (#627,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Introduction.Gary D. Glenn - 2000 - Catholic Social Science Review 5:55-60.

Add more references